Three options dominate cannabis storage: the glass mason jar, the mylar pouch, and the purpose-built storage bag. They all keep flower contained — but only one actively manages the single variable that decides whether your flower stays fresh: humidity. Containment is not preservation. Here is how the three compare when freshness, not just storage, is the goal.
This guide compares ruksak vs. mason jar vs. mylar for cannabis storage, on humidity, convenience, and cost.

The mason jar: airtight, but humidity-blind
A glass mason jar seals well and is reusable, which is why it is the default. But the jar does nothing about the humidity inside it — whatever RH the flower had when you sealed it is what it keeps drifting toward, and it has no way to correct. Too dry at seal time, the terpenes keep flashing off; too wet, mold risk climbs. To fix that you have to add a separate humidity pack, which means buying and tracking two things.
Mylar: light-proof, but flimsy and inert
Mylar pouches block light and are cheap and compact, good for short-term or transport. But they are inert — no humidity management at all — and they puncture, crease, and lose their seal with reuse. Like the jar, mylar needs a humidity pack added to do anything for freshness, and it offers less protection over time.
ruksak: storage and humidity control in one bag
ruksak is built differently. Each bag is lined with a patented fiber layer that regulates relative humidity at 62% — the published target for cured flower — using the same two-way technology as Humidi-Cure: it absorbs moisture when too humid and releases it when too dry. There is no separate pack to buy, place, or replace; the humidity control is in the bag itself. The fiber is aroma-safe, salt-free, and non-leaking, so nothing migrates onto the flower.
Head-to-head
| Feature | Mason jar | Mylar pouch | ruksak |
|---|---|---|---|
| Built-in humidity control | No (add a pack) | No (add a pack) | Yes — 62% RH built in |
| Holds 62% RH automatically | No | No | Yes, two-way |
| Light protection | No (clear glass) | Yes | Yes (opaque) |
| Reusable / durable | Yes, fragile | Limited | Yes |
| Extra pack needed | Yes | Yes | No |
Which should you choose?
If you already store in jars and like them, keep the jar and add a Humidi-Cure 62% pack — that gives a jar the humidity control it lacks. If you want one product that does both storage and humidity in a durable, light-proof, aroma-safe bag, ruksak is the simpler answer: nothing to add, nothing to forget. For a pound, the ruksak 1 lb is the workhorse; for smaller amounts the ruksak 1/2 lb fits.
Frequently asked questions
Is a mason jar good for storing cannabis?
It seals well but does nothing for humidity. Pair it with a 62% RH pack, or use a ruksak bag that has humidity control built in.
What humidity should cannabis be stored at?
62% RH preserves terpenes, weight, and structure. ruksak holds it automatically; jars and mylar need a pack added.
Does ruksak need a separate humidity pack?
No. The 62% two-way humidity control is built into the bag's fiber lining.
ruksak 1 lb or 1/2 lb?
1 lb for larger amounts, 1/2 lb for smaller stashes — both hold 62% RH.
Choose the storage that protects freshness
Skip the add-on pack and store flower in a bag that controls humidity by design.
Shop ruksak 1 lb · ruksak 1/2 lb · already use jars? Add Humidi-Cure 62%.
Related reading: ruksak 1 lb vs. 1/2 lb: Which Bag? · Humidi-Cure 62% vs. ruksak Bag
Dispensary or cultivator? Get bulk pricing
Tell us about your packaging needs, and our sales team will respond with a customized humidity-control solution, supporting certificates and competitive bulk pricing.





































